|
Topology that results from miters will generally not have sweep annotations.
|
|
|
Scheme Example
|
|
|
(define profile (wire-body:points (list (position 0 0 0)
|
|
(position 3 0 0) (position 3 3 0) (position 0 3 0)
|
|
(position 0 0 0))))
|
|
(define path (wire-body:points (list
|
|
(position 1.5 1.5 0) (position 1.5 1.5 8.5)
|
|
(position 10 1.5 8.5))))
|
|
(define opts (sweep:options "miter" "crimp"))
|
|
(define swp (sweep:law profile path opts))
|
|
(define model (list swp path))
|
|
(entity:rotate model 0 0 1 35)
|
|
|
Example 1-41. Sweep with Miter
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 1-46. Sweep With Miter
|
|
|
Although E2 and E4 are resulting from E1 and E3, there are no annotations on E2 and E4. Similarly there are no annotations on V3 and V4. Edges and vertices such as these that are a result of the sweep operation proceeding through a miter are not annotated.
|
|
|
There is a
SWEEP_ANNO_EDGE_LAT annotation with an input profile edge (E1) and an output
lateral_face (F1) in this sweep miter that results in the creation of a face. There is also a
SWEEP_ANNO_VERTEX_LAT annotation with an input profile vertex (V1) and an output
mid_lateral_edge (E5). Most miters do not produce lateral topology like this situation. It should also be noted that the two annotations described here do not have an input path edge.
|